LOVELESS ISLE Love Island fans demand George is kicked off the show before it even starts after vile Tweets are revealed

And if that’s not bad enough for George Fensom, a string of his homophobic tweets have resurfaced online.

Fans are demanding that George Fensom get the boot from Love Island after vile Tweets resurfaced

And his ex also labelled him 'controlling' and a 'cheat' online

Viewers rounded on ITV, urging them to reconsider casting the 24-year-old business exec from Bedford.

It comes after the channel was forced to bring in care measures for its Islanders this year after both the boys and girls were accused of gaslighting and coercive behaviour in past series.

Fans yesterday reacted to George’s tweets, posted in 2014, the contents of which I have chosen not to repeat.

A viewer wrote: “It’s clear ITV are full of s**t when it comes to safeguarding & duty of care, they’ve cast a guy called George on Love Island who is V problematic re misogyny and homophobia.”

A second raged: “@LoveIsland get rid of George!! @ITV why do you REPEATEDLY cast people who are publicly problematic?”

George took the chance to defend himself yesterday ahead of the new series launch on Monday.

He told The Sun: “I feel sick about those tweets. They are not who I am today and if I could turn back time I wouldn’t even have put those.”

The account is now deleted, but the contents have been widely circulated since George was announced as part of the 2023 cast.

Separately, an older video from his ex-girlfriend went viral on TikTok.

After they broke up last year, she shared photos of their time together, labelling him a cheat and a narcissist and wrote that he was “controlling over what she wore” and “constantly lied and made empty promises”.

Quizzed by The Sun on her claims, George said: “That isn’t an accusation that reflects me at all and I feel quite upset about that.”

Asked why the girl made the claims, George added: “I didn’t wish to continue with the relationship . . . but I suppose she wasn’t happy with the outcome.

But I’m not this person. I’m a nice, funny guy with terrible dad jokes.”

No one seems to be laughing now.

RUCHEE NAILS IT

THE girls might want to keep on contestant Ruchee Gurung’s good side – because she’s got a secret gameplan.

The beautician joked she could bodge her rivals’ nail paint if they stole her man.

Beautician Ruchee jokes that she could bodge the nail paint of villa rivals to get revenge on them

She laughed: “Everyone is like, ‘You’re going to be popular in the villa as everyone is going to want you to do nails’. I can do threading too.

“I was like, ‘Yeah, nobody had better p*** me off!’ I’ll be like, ‘Oops sorry!’”

HYDE HOPES

SEMI-pro footballer Tyrique Hyde wonders if any skeletons will tumble out of the closet when he’s in the villa.

Chatting from his isolation hideout yesterday, the lad said: “I have thought, ‘I wonder what girls that I have been with in the past are gonna say’.

And the show's Tyrique wonders what girls who have been with him in the past will say

“I feel I’m on good terms with everyone. I don’t think they’ll have anything too bad to say – maybe they will be jealous.

“I’ve got a 90% success rate. Whoever I go for I usually end up getting.”

PRIDE OF PLACE ON BBC

BBC Three will commemorate Pride month with a host of shows celebrating all things LGBTQ+ across June.

Six more programmes have been added into the mix after I revealed that I Kissed A Boy would return for a reunion special this month.

RuPaul’s Drag Race UK is back, while a former winner of the show reunites with her drag family in Keeping Up With Krystal Versace.

Years & Years singer Olly Alexander opens up about his mental health battle and pop culture in Growing Up Gay, plus Lily: A Transgender Story details teenager Lily Jones’ transition from male to female.

Bafta-nominated drama Pride and new mockumentary sketch show This Is Gay are part of the schedule.

THREE COURSE WINNER

IT’S the MasterChef final tomorrow night.

But who will lift the trophy? Here the three finalists, Anurag, Chariya and Omar, open up about their dreams of winning.

The MasterChef finalists open up about their dreams of winning

Anurag

THE accountant says winning the show would be the springboard to launch his food empire.

He says: “My dream is to launch a chain of Indian fine dining restaurants.

“Most important would be the flavour combinations. They’d have to be mind-blowing.”

Chariya

THE coffee supremo has proven to be a whizz under pressure with a miraculous recovery in an earlier round when she saved her bake.

She says: “I forgot to put 20 eggs in my cake then I realised it tasted like biscuits so I served it as a biscuit base, which worked out well.”

Omar

THE toy developer admits judges Gregg Wallace and John Torode aren’t as scary as they seem.

He says they “feel like your fun, encouraging uncles”.

Omar also says that if he wins, he’s giving the trophy to his mum to “stop the tears of pride from flowing.”

BEAR IS TOP FOR FLOPS

BEAR GRYLLS has branded himself the “greatest TV flop in history”.

He reckons he has earned the title because so many of his shows have been axed.

Bear Grylls has branded himself the greatest TV flop in history with so many of his shows having been canned

Bear explains: “I wrote out the number of shows we’ve had, like Get Out Alive, that have been one-season disasters.

“It was something like 32 shows that have been canned before they’ve hardly started airing.

“Technically, on paper, I’m the greatest TV flop in history.

“Nobody in the history of TV has had more shows that they own that have been cancelled than me.”

Bear is in the new series of BBC One’s Who Do You Think You Are? later this month.

Hope that’s not the death knell for that show.

Thanks to thesun for providing us with this free information so we can find out what we don't know.

Share:

ISLE BE BACK Two huge Love Island stars sign up for extreme detox reality show

The pair are among the famous faces who will be checking into E4's new series which will see a bunch of celebs tackle wacky wellness trends.

Megan is one of the famous names that has signed up for the new series

Toby is also set to appear in the wacky wellness show

The series, which has the working title The Big Celebrity Detox, is currently filming and will air later this year or early 2023.

Megan and Toby will be joined by six other stars who will try out various treatments which are not for the faint-hearted.

A source said: "Megan and Toby were real fan favourites from Love Island so bosses are hoping that signing them will bring plenty of eyeballs to this new format."

The Sun exclusively reported back in July that E4 were working on the series, which they hoped would rival some of the craziest tasks on I'm A Celeb.

Insiders revealed the channel were working on a new programme, previously titled Celebrity Retreat, which will showcase some of the weirdest and wackiest health treatments around.

This will include bee-sting acupuncture and drinking urine - and they will be testing them all out on some of our favourite TV stars.

A source said: “Forget mindful yoga and lazy mornings in the sauna, in this series the celebs will be having treatments only the brave would pay to try.

“There is even talk of bee-sting acupuncture — where the celebs will be stung - drinking urine and using bloodsucking leeches to stimulate the skin.

“Naturally all the procedures do have some benefits and they are casting eight open-minded stars who are prepared to go on a journey.

“There will be experts on hand who will be guiding the celebs throughout the experience."

Share:

E4 Big Celebrity Detox branded 'horrendous' as it leaves star 'traumatised'

The Big Celebrity Detox has reportedly left one contestant "traumatised" ahead of it airing on E4. Channel 4's sister channel will air the series, which stars ITV I'm A Celebrity star Kerry Katona and BBC Homes Under the Hammer star Martin Roberts.

Love Island's Toby, Love Island star Megan Barton Hanson and Princess Olga are also appearing. In shocking scenes set to air as part of the extreme show, Kerry and Martin are forced to drink their own urine in a bid to boost “focus and energy”.

A source said: “This will go down as one of the most nauseating scenes ever on TV. It’s horrendous, an uncomfortable moment for the celebs, but also for viewers. Kerry was particularly traumatised.” The show starts on Monday.

Princess Olga said of drinking her own wee: “It wasn’t as bad as I thought. I drink a lot of water, so it was very pale and didn’t have an odour or a particular taste.”

The eight-part series kicks off on Monday, from 9pm, on E4. The synopsis reads: "Eight famous faces live together at a retreat and undergo some of the most outlandish health and self-improvement exercises to help them change their lives.

"Spiritual guide Sah D'Simone takes Kerry Katona, Megan Barton Hanson, David Potts, Michael Venom Page, Princess Olga Romanov, Toby Aromolaran, Chloe Veitch and Martin Roberts through the first eight stages of enlightenment in the peace and tranquillity of rural Yorkshire."

Talking about the show, Channel 4 representative Genna Gibson said: "E4 has never seen a show like this before and it will test our celebrities like they’ve never been tested before – but also take them on a journey they’ll hopefully remember for the rest of their lives."

Thanks to birminghammail for providing us with this free information so we can find out what we don't know.

Share:

Davina McCall and Sir Salman Rushdie win at British Book Awards

Menopausing, by McCall and Dr Naomi Potter, was named overall book of the year.

The so-called "Davina effect" saw a huge increase in demand for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after a Channel 4 documentary on the subject.

Novelist Sir Salman Rushdie was also honoured, nine months after being attacked on stage in New York.

McCall and Potter's Menopausing was praised by a panel of judges which included Channel 4 newsreader Krishnan Guru-Murthy, broadcaster Anita Rani, and DJ Vick Hope.

Six months after publication, it continues to rank highly in the bestseller charts.

Guru-Murthy said the book had helped to start a national conversation about menopause.

He said the broadcaster and the menopause doctor had produced an authoritative and entertaining book about "an important and ignored subject".

Long Lost Family presenter McCall has previously said she though she had a brain tumour or Alzheimer's when suffering from perimenopausal symptoms.

Her experience with her changing hormones led her to the decision to campaign to increase awareness and destigmatise the menopause.

Her Channel 4 documentary Sex, Myths and Menopause was broadcast in 2021 and Menopausing was published in September 2022.

Meanwhile, Sir Salman Rushdie said he was proud to receive the Freedom to Publish award on behalf of "everybody fighting that fight".

The award-winning writer lost the vision in one eye and spent six weeks in hospital after being attacked on stage ahead of a speech in New York in August 2022.

He has long faced death threats for his 1988 novel The Satanic Verses.

  • Salman Rushdie says he's lucky following attack
  • Salman Rushdie: The writer who emerged from hiding

In his acceptance speech, he said: "We live in a moment, I think, at which freedom of expression, freedom to publish has not in my lifetime been under such threat in the countries of the West."

The author said the freedom to publish was also the freedom to read what you want without it being decided for you externally.

Rushdie voiced concern about the loss of libraries and books for children in schools.

He described it as an "extraordinary attack" and added: "It is quite remarkably alarming, and we need to be very aware of it, and to fight against it very hard."

He also warned publishers against altering the work of authors like Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming. He said they should resist that and allow books "to come to us from their time and be of their time."

Philip Jones, editor of The Bookseller and chair of the judging panel said publishers had played a role in creating conversations around "mental health, misogyny, sexuality and gender, the menopause and more".

Others who were recognised at the awards, which were held in London on Monday evening, include:

  • Bonnie Garmus, who wrote her debut novel Lessons in Chemistry when she was 64, was named author of the year
  • Richard E Grant, whose memoir A Pocketful of Happiness won the audiobook non-fiction award
  • Alice Oseman, the creator of the Heartstopper graphic novels which inspired the Netflix series, was named illustrator of the year
  • RF Kuang won fiction book of the year for her breakout success Babel
  • SF Said for Tyger, Dr Alex George for A Better Day, Sheena Patel for I'm a Fan, and Louise Kennedy for Trespasses
Share:

Why the UN can't afford to disengage with the Taliban

Who Are The TalibanSource: bing.com

The Taliban, a militant group that has been fighting a war with the Afghan government and its allies for more than two decades, is widely considered to be a terrorist organization. Despite this, the United Nations has been engaging with the Taliban in an effort to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Afghanistan.

Taliban And Human RightsSource: bing.com

Taliban and Human Rights

One of the main reasons why the UN cannot afford to disengage with the Taliban is the issue of human rights. The Taliban has been accused of numerous human rights violations, including the mistreatment of women and girls, the use of child soldiers, and the targeting of civilians. These are serious concerns that need to be addressed if there is any hope for a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

By engaging with the Taliban, the UN can raise these issues and push for reforms that will improve the human rights situation in Afghanistan. This may not be an easy task, but it is a necessary one if the UN hopes to make progress towards a lasting peace in the country.

Pros And Cons Of Engaging With The TalibanSource: bing.com

Pros and Cons of Engaging with the Taliban

There are both pros and cons to engaging with the Taliban. On the one hand, engaging with the group may provide an opportunity to facilitate peace talks and bring an end to the conflict in Afghanistan. On the other hand, engaging with the Taliban may legitimize their actions and give them a platform to advance their extremist views.

Despite these risks, the UN has continued to engage with the Taliban, recognizing that the benefits of doing so outweigh the risks. By engaging with the group, the UN can keep the lines of communication open and work towards a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

Taliban And TerrorismSource: bing.com

Taliban and Terrorism

Another reason why the UN cannot afford to disengage with the Taliban is the issue of terrorism. The Taliban has long been associated with various terrorist groups, including Al-Qaeda. While the Taliban has claimed to distance itself from these groups in recent years, there are still concerns about their ties to terrorism.

By engaging with the Taliban, the UN can help to ensure that the group does not provide a safe haven for terrorist organizations. This is important not only for Afghanistan, but for the broader international community as well.

Taliban And DrugsSource: bing.com

Taliban and Drugs

The Taliban is also heavily involved in the drug trade in Afghanistan, particularly in the production of opium. This is a major source of funding for the group, and it has been a major obstacle to peace negotiations in the past.

By engaging with the Taliban, the UN can push for reforms that will reduce the group's reliance on the drug trade. This will not only help to undermine the group's finances, but it will also improve the overall security situation in Afghanistan.

Taliban And GovernanceSource: bing.com

Taliban and Governance

Finally, the UN cannot afford to disengage with the Taliban because of the issue of governance. The Taliban has long been critical of the Afghan government, and has sought to establish its own governance structures in areas under its control.

By engaging with the Taliban, the UN can work towards a more inclusive governance structure in Afghanistan. This will not only help to address the concerns of the Taliban and other militant groups, but it will also help to ensure that all Afghans have a voice in the governance of their country.

Conclusion

While there are certainly risks associated with engaging with the Taliban, the UN cannot afford to disengage from the group. By continuing to engage with the Taliban, the UN can work towards a more peaceful and inclusive Afghanistan that respects human rights and rejects terrorism. This is a difficult task, but it is one that is necessary if the UN hopes to make progress towards a lasting peace in the country.

Related video of Why the UN can't afford to disengage with the Taliban

Share:

US: Texas man accused of killing neighbors arrested

Texas PoliceSource: bing.com

A Texas man has been arrested and charged with capital murder in the shooting deaths of his neighbors. According to local authorities, the shooting occurred on Sunday evening in the town of Katy, Texas, located west of Houston.

The victims

Texas NeighborSource: bing.com

The victims have been identified as 42-year-old Jason Buckner and his 36-year-old wife, Heather. The couple was shot multiple times in their home, and their bodies were found by their teenage son.

The suspect

Texas ManSource: bing.com

The suspect, identified as 56-year-old William Hudson, was arrested on Monday morning after a brief manhunt. Hudson was found hiding in a nearby field and surrendered without incident.

The motive

Texas NeighborhoodSource: bing.com

The motive for the shooting remains unclear. However, local authorities have stated that Hudson had an ongoing dispute with the Buckner family over noise complaints.

The investigation

Texas Police CarSource: bing.com

The investigation into the shooting is ongoing. Local authorities have stated that they are interviewing witnesses and gathering evidence to build their case against Hudson.

The charges

Texas CourtSource: bing.com

Hudson has been charged with capital murder, which carries a possible death sentence in the state of Texas. He is currently being held without bail in the Harris County jail.

The community's reaction

Texas CommunitySource: bing.com

The Buckner family was well-known and well-liked in their community. Their tragic deaths have left their neighbors in shock and mourning. Many have expressed their condolences and have offered their support to the family.

The impact on the town

Texas TownSource: bing.com

The shooting has had a profound impact on the town of Katy. Many residents have expressed their concern over the violence that has occurred in their community, and have called for increased police presence and crime prevention measures.

The legal process

Texas LawSource: bing.com

The legal process for capital murder cases in Texas can be lengthy and complex. Hudson will likely face a preliminary hearing in the coming weeks, and his case will eventually be presented to a grand jury for indictment. If he is found guilty, Hudson could face the death penalty.

The role of the media

Texas NewsSource: bing.com

The media has played a significant role in covering the shooting. Local news outlets have provided updates on the investigation and legal proceedings, and have interviewed members of the community and the Buckner family. The coverage has helped to raise awareness of the tragedy and has sparked important conversations about violence and crime prevention.

The need for justice

Texas JusticeSource: bing.com

Ultimately, the Buckner family and their community are seeking justice for their loved ones. While nothing can bring Jason and Heather back, they hope that the legal system will hold Hudson accountable for his actions and prevent future tragedies from occurring.

Related video of US: Texas man accused of killing neighbors arrested

Share:

Lithuania legalizes pushbacks

Lithuania Legalizes PushbacksSource: bing.com

On July 27, 2021, the Lithuanian parliament passed a bill that allows border guards to push back illegal migrants and asylum seekers to neighboring non-European Union countries. The law has drawn criticism from human rights groups and the European Union, which has launched an investigation to determine whether Lithuania violated EU law.

What are Pushbacks?

PushbacksSource: bing.com

Pushbacks refer to the practice of forcibly returning migrants and asylum seekers to the country from which they came or to a third country without any legal procedure. It is a controversial practice that has been criticized by human rights groups and the United Nations for violating international law and putting people's lives at risk.

Why Did Lithuania Legalize Pushbacks?

Lithuania Legalizes PushbacksSource: bing.com

Lithuania, like many other European countries, has seen a surge of illegal migration in recent years. In 2020, over 4,000 illegal migrants and asylum seekers arrived in Lithuania, more than triple the number from the previous year. The country has accused Belarus of orchestrating the influx of migrants as part of a political retaliation for Lithuania's support for the opposition in Belarus. The Lithuanian government argues that the pushback law is necessary to maintain border security and prevent illegal migration.

What are the Consequences of Legalizing Pushbacks?

Consequences Of Legalizing PushbacksSource: bing.com

The legalization of pushbacks has sparked a fierce debate about its consequences. Human rights groups argue that it violates international law and puts people's lives at risk by exposing them to violence, abuse, and persecution in the countries from which they are pushed back. The European Union has warned Lithuania that it may face consequences if it violates EU law, including the suspension of funds.

What is the EU's Response?

Eu'S Response To Lithuania Legalizing PushbacksSource: bing.com

The European Union has launched an investigation into Lithuania's pushback law to determine whether it violates EU law and human rights standards. The EU has warned Lithuania that it may face consequences if it violates EU law, including the suspension of funds. The EU also urged Lithuania to respect its obligations under international law and ensure that people's rights are protected.

What is the Reaction of Human Rights Groups?

Human Rights Groups Reaction To Lithuania Legalizing PushbacksSource: bing.com

Human rights groups have condemned Lithuania's pushback law as inhumane and illegal. Amnesty International called on Lithuania to revoke the law, warning that it could result in serious human rights violations. Human Rights Watch also criticized the law, warning that it could result in the mass refoulement of people seeking international protection.

What is the Response of Belarus?

Belarus Response To Lithuania Legalizing PushbacksSource: bing.com

Belarus has denied the accusations that it is behind the surge of illegal migration to Lithuania. The country's foreign ministry has criticized Lithuania's pushback law, calling it "barbaric" and warning that it could lead to a humanitarian crisis. Belarus has also threatened to retaliate against Lithuania, including by suspending border controls and redirecting the flow of migrants to other EU countries.

Conclusion

The legalization of pushbacks in Lithuania has sparked a fierce debate about its consequences and legality. While the Lithuanian government argues that it is necessary to maintain border security and prevent illegal migration, human rights groups and the European Union warn that it violates international law and puts people's lives at risk. The investigation launched by the EU will determine whether Lithuania violated EU law. The pushback law raises important questions about the balance between border security and human rights that require careful consideration.

Related video of Lithuania Legalizes Pushbacks: What Does it Mean?

Share: